Make vs Zapier
Side-by-side comparison of Make and Zapier: pricing, features, API access, and community ratings.
TL;DR: Zapier offers significantly more app integrations (9,000+ vs 3,500+) and is purely focused on non-technical users, while Make provides a more flexible approach that accommodates both no-code users and developers who want to write custom JavaScript/Python code. Zapier emphasizes AI-powered self-healing workflows and automated error recovery, whereas Make highlights its visual workflow builder and AI agent management capabilities. Both are enterprise-ready with similar security certifications, but your choice depends on whether you prioritize breadth of integrations and simplicity (Zapier) or visual workflow design with coding options (Make).
Make Visual no-code automation platform — connect apps and automate workflows with a drag-and-drop builder. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & agents | Automation & agents |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | USD 9/mo | USD 19.99/mo |
| Free tier | ||
| Audience | All audiences | Non-technical |
| API available | ||
| Open source | ||
| Self-hostable | ||
| Model provider | Make AI Provider (own LLM), plus bring-your-own LLM key | |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Prague, CZ | US |
| Key strengths |
|
|